©picture alliance / NurPhoto | Image Press Agency
Should OpenAI have been allowed to become a commercial company? This question is the stakes in a court case between two of the most influential tech billionaires on the planet: head of Tesla and X Elon Musk and chief executive of ChatGPT maker OpenAI Sam Altman.
Elon Musk and OpenAI are facing off in a lawsuit that follows a principled dispute over the future of artificial intelligence. Indeed, Musk, co-founder of the company in 2015, argues that OpenAI has abandoned its original mission and become too commoditized.
The core of the dispute revolves around OpenAI's transformation from a non-profit research organization to a company with a commercial structure and large investors. According to Musk, the move violates the agreements and ideals with which OpenAI was once founded. Musk argues that OpenAI was founded on the idea of developing AI "for the good of humanity". He donated some $38 million to the project in its early years. Musk pulled out of OpenAI in 2018. Since then, OpenAI has turned into a commercial company, where people can purchase paid subscriptions for ChatGPT. By its own admission, OpenAI currently turns around $2 billion in revenue per month.
OpenAI defends itself against Elon Musk's accusations by arguing that the commercial course was necessary in order to attract sufficient capital, computing power and talent in the global AI race. The company stresses that the current structure is necessary to continue large-scale investment in secure and powerful AI systems.
Musk is reportedly demanding hefty damages and wants OpenAI to return to a structure closer to its original intent. At the same time, OpenAI points out that Musk himself is operating in the same market with xAI, which the company says exposes the business motives behind his legal battle.
©picture alliance / NurPhoto | Image Press Agency